Brown v. Board of Education is a landmark case decided by the US Supreme Court. The ruling in this case, Brown v. Board of Education, focuses on whether or not a classroom cannot be used for purposes of racial discrimination. The court ruled that the practice of requiring desegregating students based solely on their race was unlawful. The case has become quite the controversy since it establishes the right of a student to be free to choose how he or she would sit in any classroom regardless of their background. As a result of this ruling, it is important for educators to understand how does the excerpts relate to the premises of Brown v. Board of Education.
First, in order for a decision regarding how to do the Brown v. Board of Education apply in your classroom you must determine whether or not a reading curriculum can be changed to accommodate a Black or Hispanic child. In order to do this, you must read the entire opinion of the United States Supreme Court in the case and review all its reasoning and precedents. Additionally, in order to decide how to do the Brown v. Board of Education apply to your state, you will need to read what the case documents say about how states are allowed to administer their public schools. While the opinion indicates that the practice of requiring students to read a statement explaining their race in the school, along with being asked to write an essay about their race, is within the power of the state to implement, several state legislatures have already moved to ban this practice.
Brown v. Board of Education
Once you have determined that a reading program can be implemented, you must also look at how to do the Brown v. Board of Education apply to your state. The court recognizes that the current delivery of education in America may compromise citizens’ rights to meaningful participation in the development of their culture and society. To protect these rights, the court has ordered that all public schools receive a multicultural education, which means that they must give students of varying cultures equal opportunities for learning. This does not mean that every student enrolled in a public school is of a certain race or nationality. However, the court has ordered that students must learn about various cultures and their experiences so that they can understand the prejudice and hostility that exist in certain cultures and why those cultures consider some issues to be more important than others.
The third question that you must answer when asking how does the excerpt relates to the premises of v. a board of education?
The third question is whether the public schools can continue to function as they have been doing. The decision says that the state must continue to operate the separate but equal educational facilities that the Constitution requires. The fourth amendment provides that the right of persons to attend public schools, both white and colored, shall be preserved.
The fourth question that you must answer when asking how does the quotation relate to the premises of v. a board of education?
The fourth question is whether the case addresses the inherently unequal nature of education systems. The fourth Amendment was designed to prevent the unjustified discrimination against citizens of color. The Court has repeatedly held that it is not inherently unfair for a white person to be denied access to educational facilities or to be excluded from exercising his or her right to vote because of that person’s color.
The fifth question that you must answer when asking how does the excerpt relates to the premises of v. a board of education?
The fifth question is whether the case addresses the nature of the unequal treatment of racial minorities that is found in the quotation. The Court has ruled that the quoted portion of Brown v. board of education, while relevant to the case, did not describe an action that was legally wrong. Rather, the language in the Fifth Amendment refers to the lack of any reason why persons should be denied the right to vote.